Two isostructural heterometallic trinuclear oxalato-bridged complexes of formula C(4)[MCr(2)(ox)(6)(H(2)O)(2)]·nH(2)O (C(+) = 4-aminopyridinium; ox(2-) = oxalate dianion; M(2+) = Mn(2+), n = 3, 1; M(2+) = Co(2+), n = 3.25, 2) have been synthesized by using direct self-assembly methods combining C(3)[Cr(ox)(3)] and the chloride salts of the corresponding metal ion. The crystal structures of both compounds have been resolved by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. They crystallize in the C2/c space group [a = 11.5113(15) Å, b = 20.250(3) Å, c = 21.810(4) Å, beta = 100.447(10) degrees, V = 5161.6(3) Å(3), and Z = 4 for 1, and a = 11.4334(16) Å, b = 20.243(2) Å, c = 21.805(3) Å, beta = 101.113(9) degrees, V = 4951.9(11) Å(3), and Z = 4 for 2]. The structures of 1 and 2 consist of discrete linear [MCr(2)(ox)(6)](4-) bimetallic trinuclear units, pyridinium cations and crystallization water molecules. The linear trinuclear unit is built from a central trans-diaquametal(II), linked to two Cr(ox)(3)](3-) entities by oxalate bridges. One of the oxalate ions is coordinated to the central metal ion whereas the other two oxalate ligands are non-bridging. In the crystal, intermolecular hydrogen bonds involving oxalate ligands, water molecules and pyridinium cations, build a complex three-dimensional network. Variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements for 1 and 2 indicate a weak ferromagnetic interaction (J = +1.16 and +2.62/+2.70 cm(-1) for 1 and 2, respectively) between the two terminal Cr(III) (S(Cr) = 3/2) and the central high-spin Mn(II) (S(Mn) = 5/2) and Co(II) (S(Co) = 3/2) ions. The nature and the amplitude of the exchange interaction are rationalized using DFT calculations and orbital interpretations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pardo et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: