Key result
Prolonged antiplatelet therapy cuts vascular disease ~15% in secondary prevention but lacks primary prevention benefit.
Why the study?
The effects of prolonged antiplatelet therapy on the primary and secondary incidence of vascular disease were estimated to clarify its benefits and risks.
Does prolonged antiplatelet therapy reduce the incidence of vascular disease in individuals with and without a history of vascular disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=56,000)
Yes
Does prolonged antiplatelet therapy reduce the incidence of vascular disease in individuals with and without a history of vascular disease?
Effect estimate: 15% reduction
Antiplatelet therapy provides clear net benefits for secondary prevention of vascular disease, but its role in primary prevention remains unclear due to lack of net benefit and potential increased risk of disabling strokes.
Reinforces antiplatelet therapy for secondary vascular prevention; confirms no net benefit in primary prevention.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of prolonged antiplatelet therapy on the primary and secondary incidence of vascular disease. DATA SOURCES: Twenty-five randomised trials in 29,000 patients with a history of vascular disease (the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration) and two randomised trials in 27,000 individuals without a history of vascular disease (the British doctors' and American physicians' studies). STUDY SELECTION: The Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration obtained data from all randomised trials of secondary prevention completed before January 1988. The British doctors' and American physicians' studies are the only two completed randomised trials of primary prevention. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from the secondary prevention trials were provided by the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. Data from the primary prevention trials were extracted from the final published reports of these studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: In the secondary prevention trials, antiplatelet therapy reduced the rate of vascular disease by about 15% and the incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke by about 30%. In the American physicians' study, but not the British doctors' study, the incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction was also reduced. In neither primary prevention trial was there evidence of reduced rates of non-fatal stroke or vascular death; overall, fatal or disabling strokes were slightly more frequent among those assigned aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a history of vascular disease, the benefits of antiplatelet therapy appear to outweigh any risks. Among 100 such patients, antiplatelet therapy for two years would prevent one death and two major non-fatal events. The balance of benefits and risks for individuals without a history of vascular disease is less clear because there is no firm evidence of a net reduction in either vascular death or disabling non-fatal vascular events among those treated with aspirin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacMahon et al. (1991) conducted a meta-analysis in Vascular disease (n=56,000). Antiplatelet therapy (aspirin) vs. Control was evaluated on Primary and secondary incidence of vascular disease (15% reduction). Prolonged antiplatelet therapy reduced the rate of vascular disease by about 15% in patients with a history of vascular disease, but showed no clear net benefit in primary prevention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: