Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Morphology- and crystal facet-controlled Cu2O nanocrystals (NCs), including cubic Cu2O (c-Cu2O) NCs with {100} facets, rhombic dodecahedral Cu2O (d-Cu2O) NCs with {110} facets, and concave octahedral Cu2O (o-Cu2O) NCs with high-index facets, are prepared and employed as catalysts for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to C2+ products (ethylene, ethanol, and n-propanol). In situ Raman characterizations demonstrate that the surfaces of all three Cu2O NCs are rapidly converted to metallic Cu during CO2 reduction and reoxidized to smaller-sized Cu2O NCs after tests. Specifically, the o-Cu2O catalyst reveals the highest Faradaic efficiency (48.3%) and partial current density (17.7 mA cm–2) for C2+ products at −1.1 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode compared to c-Cu2O and d-Cu2O, which is competitive among the reported Cu and Cu2O catalysts. In addition, abundant crystal defects/grain boundaries and high-index facets are observed on the surface of reconstructed o-Cu2O, which may serve as the active sites and benefit the C–C coupling during CO2 reduction. This work provides a new strategy to achieve efficient C2+ production from electrochemical CO2 reduction via crystal facet regulation of Cu2O catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: