Thallium (Tl) has been identified as a priority contaminant because of its severe toxic effects. Exact measurement of Tl is a challenge because it is difficult to avoid altering the element’s chemical speciation during sampling, transport, and storage. In situ measurement may be a good choice. Based on the in situ technique of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT), new DGT devices equipped with novel laboratory-synthesized manganese oxide (δ-MnO 2 ) binding gels were developed and systematically validated for the measurement of Tl, including Tl(I) and Tl(III) species, in water. Comparison between Chelex binding gel and δ-MnO 2 gel on the uptake kinetics of Tl demonstrated that δ-MnO 2 binding gels could adsorb Tl rapidly and effectively. Removal of Tl from the δ-MnO 2 gels was achieved by use of 1 mol·L –1 oxalic acid, yielding elution efficiencies of 1.0 for Tl(I) and 0.86 for TI(III). Theoretical responses from DGT devices loaded with δ-MnO 2 gel (δ-MnO 2 -DGT) were obtained irrespective of pH (4–9) and ionic strength (0.1–200 mmol·L –1 NaNO 3 ). δ-MnO 2 -DGT showed good potential for long-term monitoring of Tl due to its high adsorption capacity of 27.1 μg·cm –2 and the stable performance of δ-MnO 2 binding gel kept in solution, containing only 10 mmol·L –1 NaNO 3, for at least 117 days. Field deployment trials confirmed that δ-MnO 2 -DGT can accurately measure the time-averaged concentrations of Tl in fluvial watercourses. In summary, the newly developed δ-MnO 2 -DGT technique shows potential for environmental monitoring and biogeochemical investigation of Tl in waters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: