Paradoxo maior da Scientometria: a) Estatisticamente, os métodos só são válidos “for a large (whole) sets of publications, but they are applied for assessing part-sets.” b) Mas cada vez é maior a importância da “microscientometrics” (equipas, laboratórios, especialidades, …): «Each assessment may be regarde as a special exercise. There are no recommendations detailled (…); there are general relationships and conclusions…»
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2011 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: