This paper bridges two distinct traditions – philosophy of mathematics and proof theory – to provide a formal framework for explanatory proofs in mathematics. We focus on explanatory proofs that uncover the grounds of mathematical theorems, and we formalize their structure using a new “axioms-as-rules” approach. Our method ensures the transformation of axioms into inference rules while preserving key logical properties such as soundness, completeness, and cut-admissibility. Two classical examples, the Quadrangle Theorem and Pythagoras’ Theorem, are revisited to show how explanatory steps can be systematically isolated and formalized. This framework not only offers novel proof-theoretic insights but also enhances our understanding of mathematical explanations by bridging informal intuition with rigorous formalism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pimentel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: