The rapid expansion of mobile payment services has exposed third-party platforms to heterogeneous, cross-layer security threats that traditional risk assessment tools capture only partially. Existing approaches fall into two camps: some rest on subjective expert judgment that is never refined against evidence, while others deploy purely data-driven classifiers whose outputs managers cannot interpret. This study proposes a web-based collaborative decision support system (CDSS) for mobile payment security (MPS) risk assessment. It couples a three-cluster indicator system, grounded in a four-layer threat taxonomy, with a hybrid analytical engine that combines fuzzy analytic network process (ANP), entropy weighting, and a back-propagation neural network, while a rule-based and case-based reasoning module translates the composite security risk value (SRV) into actionable strategies through a five-tier color-coded mapping. We implemented the prototype on a B/S architecture using PHP, MySQL, and Apache and validated it against transactional data from a regional Chinese third-party payment platform serving over 90,000 merchants, supplemented by two public benchmark datasets. The framework achieves 94.3% accuracy and 0.962 AUC, outperforming classical AHP, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and SVM baselines, with the widest margins on cross-layer contagion and user-behavior risk categories. Response latency stays below 2.5 s under 200 concurrent users, and scoring consistency holds across two orders of magnitude in sample size. A white-box stress test additionally characterises how the pipeline behaves under adversarial input manipulation: risk-grade assignments survive in more than 95% of cases at the mildest gradient budget and degrade gradually thereafter, more slowly than the SVM baseline but without any guarantee against a determined attacker. The evidence therefore supports practical viability inside the operating envelope of a regional payment ecosystem, while the single-site validation and the adversarial exposure reported here mark the limits of that claim.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: