Diabetes mellitus (DM) significantly impairs quality of life (QoL) through its chronic course, treatment burden, and complications. Disease-specific QoL tools provide more clinically relevant assessment than generic instruments. Although the Diabetes Quality of Life–Brief Clinical Inventory (DQOL-BCI) has been widely validated internationally, no validated Tamil version exists despite large Tamil-speaking populations affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate a Tamil version of the DQOL-BCI (DQOL-BCI-T) among Tamil-speaking adults with T2DM in Sri Lanka. A cross-sectional validation study of DQOL-BCI-T was conducted among 165 native Tamil-speaking adults with T2DM attending an urban outpatient clinic in Colombo from May to October 2025). Translation followed a standardized forward–backward procedure with expert panel review and cognitive debriefing. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity was evaluated through convergent validity with the Tamil WHOQOL-BREF and discriminant validity across clinical variables. Factor structure was examined using principal component analysis with oblimin rotation. The DQOL-BCI-T demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.682) and stability over two weeks. Significant moderate negative correlations with WHOQOL-BREF total ( r = − 0.559, p < 0.001) and domain scores supported convergent validity. Discriminant validity was demonstrated by significantly lower QoL among patients with microvascular complications ( p = 0.040). Factor analysis showed satisfactory sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.729) and acceptable item loadings, explaining 72% of total variance. The DQOL-BCI-T demonstrates satisfactory validity, reliability, and cultural appropriateness for measuring diabetes-specific quality of life among Tamil-speaking adults with T2DM. Its concise format and strong psychometric performance make it a practical tool for routine clinical assessment and research, supporting patient-centred diabetes care. Further validation across diverse clinical populations, socio-cultural contexts, and treatment regimens is warranted to confirm its broader applicability and generalisability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darshana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: