Innovation and creativity have become strategic priorities for higher education institutions (HEIs), placing increasing emphasis on supervisory behaviours that foster innovative employee performance. Despite growing interest in innovation-supportive leadership, there is limited research identifying the behavioural dimensions of supervisory behaviour and providing a validated instrument to measure them. This study addresses this gap by developing and conducting a preliminary psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire measuring supervisory behaviours that foster employee-driven innovation (EDI) and creativity in higher education. Following established scale development procedures, supervisory behaviour was conceptualised as a unidimensional construct. A quantitative survey was conducted, and data were collected from 624 academic and administrative employees in an open distance and e-learning (ODeL) institution in South Africa using a census approach and self-administered electronic questionnaires. Exploratory factor analysis using principal axis factoring revealed a single-factor solution explaining 63.5% of the variance and supported the unidimensional structure, while reliability analyses and exploratory factor analysis provided preliminary evidence supporting the questionnaire’s psychometric properties. The resulting instrument provides researchers with a preliminary measure of supervisory support for innovation and creativity and offers HEIs a useful foundation for future research, leadership development, and innovation initiatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coetzee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: