Cross-sectional survey reveals widespread GLP-1 receptor agonist use in Switzerland, indicating significant informal medication sharing among younger, normal-weight individuals.
Background Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for weight management is increasing, but population-level data on uptake and access pathways remain limited. This study investigated prevalence in Switzerland, associated factors, and characteristics of formal, and informal access users. Methods A nationally representative cross-sectional survey of the Swiss population was performed using a probabilistic sampling design with survey weights. Between March and June 2025, 5,818 residents aged ≥ 15 years were surveyed, representing 7.43 million individuals nationally. Self-reported GLP-1 receptor agonist use, indications, access pathways, and sociodemographic and weight-related characteristics were collected. Multivariable models estimated national prevalence and identify factors independently associated with use and informal access. Results In weighted analyses, 2.5% (95% CI 2.1-3.0) of respondents, corresponding to approximately 185,000 individuals nationally, reported GLP-1 receptor agonist use, most commonly semaglutide, primarily for weight loss. Use was independently associated with age, body mass index (BMI) category, and self-reported weight status. Compared with participants reporting normal weight, higher odds were observed among those reporting important overweight (OR 6.94, 95% CI 3.01–16.02) and among those with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² (OR 8.54, 95% CI 4.34–16.81). Gender was not associated with use. Among users, 7.3% (> 13,500 individuals nationally) reported obtaining medication at least once outside physician-led prescribing pathways or passing it forwards to family and friends. These individuals were younger, more likely to be single and to report normal weight. Conclusions GLP-1 receptor agonist use in Switzerland is patterned by both BMI and perceived weight. Informal access, particularly among younger adults with lower BMI, warrants clinical and policy attention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buclin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: