The global energy sector is currently undergoing a major transformation toward sustainable, low-carbon, and energy-efficient technologies. Commercial buildings are among the largest consumers of electrical and thermal energy due to heating, ventilation, air-conditioning (HVAC), lighting, office equipment, and domestic hot water demand. Conventional building energy systems typically rely on separate electricity generation from the power grid and fossil-fuel-based heating systems such as gas boilers. These systems suffer from low overall efficiency, high operational costs, poor waste heat utilization, and significant greenhouse gas emissions. This project presents a hybrid Gas Motor (EMS) Combined Heat and Power (CHP) and electrically driven Heat Pump system modelled in MATLAB/Simulink. The system is coordinated by a rule-based Energy Management System. The EMS receives electricity price, gas price, outdoor temperature, building heat demand, and heat-pump temperature suitability as inputs. It produces an operating mode, gas-motor command, and heat-pump electrical command. The gas motor is represented by 30% electrical efficiency, 55% thermal efficiency, and 15% losses. A heat-exchanger efficiency of 95% is used to recover useful heat. The heat pump is represented using an outdoor-temperature-dependent COP characteristic, with representative COP values from 2.2 at −10 °C to 4.5 at 20 °C. The total useful heat is evaluated from recovered CHP heat and heat-pump output and is compared with building demand. For the reported German office-building case, annual gas consumption decreases from 171,952 kWh to 84,000 kWh. Net annual operating cost decreases from €21,282 to €10,985, giving a saving of €10,297 per year. Net annual CO₂ emissions decrease from 44,326 kg to 13,834 kg, equivalent to a 68.8% reduction. The results demonstrate the potential of EMS-controlled CHP and Heat Pump integration for improving energy utilization, reducing operating cost, and lowering emissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elbayoumy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: