Key result
Preoperative varenicline use was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events compared with nicotine replacement therapy or continued smoking.
Why the study?
Does preoperative varenicline reduce myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events in cardiac surgery patients compared with nicotine replacement therapy or continued smoking?
Does preoperative varenicline reduce myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events in cardiac surgery patients compared with nicotine replacement therapy or continued smoking?
This letter highlights that the observed benefits of preoperative varenicline in cardiac surgery should be interpreted with caution due to potential confounding by actual abstinence duration and surgical urgency.
Yan et al. reported lower rates of myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events among cardiac surgery patients receiving preoperative varenicline compared with nicotine replacement therapy or continued smoking. This letter highlights several points that may help interpret these findings. A prescription within three months before surgery may not reflect the actual duration of preoperative abstinence, which is itself clinically relevant. Operative urgency and the time available for smoking cessation may also influence outcomes. In addition, the 2005–2025 study period spans major changes in perioperative practice. Future prospective studies should incorporate verified abstinence, treatment adherence, and surgical urgency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alizamin Yusifli (2026) conducted a letter in cardiac surgery. preoperative varenicline vs. nicotine replacement therapy or continued smoking was evaluated on myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events. Preoperative varenicline use was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events compared with nicotine replacement therapy or continued smoking.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: