The proteolytic activity of cathepsins plays a key role in post-mortem changes in fish muscle, affecting texture, flavour development and overall product quality. Reliable determination of cathepsin B and L activities in crude fish muscle extracts is challenging because of limited substrate specificity and strong matrix effects. The classical differential method is based on Z‑Arg‑Arg‑AMC (cathepsin B) and Z‑Phe‑Arg‑AMC (cathepsin B + L) with subsequent subtraction (L = (B + L) − B). However, differences in the catalytic efficiencies of cathepsin B against these two substrates and interference from other protease classes can lead to even negative calculated values for cathepsin L in crude extracts. In this study, extraction conditions and inhibitor profiling of purified cathepsins D, B and L from Baltic herring muscle were evaluated. The experiments revealed substantial interdependence between protease classes and demonstrated that the classical differential approach for cathepsin L determination may fail under crude‑extract conditions. Purified enzymes showed distinct NaCl sensitivities: cathepsins B and D were strongly inhibited at 3–5 g/100 g NaCl, whereas cathepsin L activity increased under the same conditions. These differences in salt sensitivity enabled the use of NaCl for functional enrichment of cathepsin L contribution to activity in crude extracts. The NaCl‑addition assay reduced non-specific protease contributions and eliminated subtraction-derived artefacts without the need for selective synthetic inhibitors. The proposed NaCl-addition approach retains the classical two-substrate framework while improving robustness and interpretability in complex fish muscle matrices. The approach can be readily adopted by laboratories without purchasing new substrates or inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mariusz Szymczak (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: