Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review categorizes deep learning paradigms for sign language translation across standard benchmarks, indicating gloss-free methods mitigate data bottlenecks.
Sign Language Translation (SLT) is crucial for communication between Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing communities and society. Advances in deep learning have enabled promising sign-to-text systems, yet progress remains constrained by limited data, complex spatiotemporal dynamics, and non-manual cues. This survey reviews deep learning-based SLT methods across gloss-based, gloss-free, and weakly gloss-free paradigms, summarizing reported performance on RWTH-PHOENIX-Weather 2014T (PHOENIX-2014T), CSL-Daily, and How2Sign. Gloss-free approaches are increasingly explored as annotation-efficient alternatives, leveraging contrastive learning, self-supervised alignment, and multimodal fusion to reduce reliance on costly manual gloss annotations. Remaining challenges include dataset diversity, temporal modeling, evaluation reliability, real-world robustness, and cross-linguistic generalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: