Experimental study demonstrates quantitative microvascular velocity reductions under hyperoxia in rat retina and cortex, indicating robust volumetric flow mapping capabilities.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to introduce variable interscan saturation alignment (VISA), an optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)-based method for wide-range flow velocimetry with angular tolerance, and validate its ability to quantify hyperoxia-induced hemodynamic changes in rat retina and cerebral cortex. Methods: VISA achieved 92.6% mean velocity estimation accuracy over 1.0 to 20.0 mm/s, with a strong linear association between estimated and preset velocities (R² = 0.996), and stable measurements across 35 degrees to 90 degrees. In vivo imaging resolved layer-specific blood flow. Hyperoxia reduced flow velocity in the superficial vascular plexus, deep capillary plexus, and choroid by 21.88 ± 17.71%, 20.00 ± 10.91%, and 24.81 ± 15.18%, respectively, and superficial cortical flow velocity by 5.67 ± 1.81% (P < 0.05). Results: In phantom studies, VISA achieved a mean velocity estimation accuracy of 92.6% across the 1.0 to 20.0 mm/s range, with strong linear association between measured and preset velocities (R² = 0.996), and maintained stable measurements across the tested incident angles of 35 degrees to 90 degrees at 4 preset flow velocities (7.5, 10.0, 12.5, and 15.0 mm/s). In vivo imaging resolved layer-specific blood flow in the retina and cerebral cortex. Hyperoxia induced significant reductions in flow velocity in the superficial vascular plexus, deep capillary plexus, and choroid by 21.88 ± 17.71%, 20.00 ± 10.91%, and 24.81 ± 15.18%, respectively, and reduced superficial cortical flow velocity by 5.67 ± 1.81% (P < 0.05). Conclusions: VISA enables wide-range quantitative OCTA velocimetry with angular tolerance under the tested phantom conditions and quantifies hyperoxia-induced microvascular responses in the rat retina and cerebral cortex, supporting volumetric flow mapping in retinal and cerebral microcirculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: