Key result
Smartphone-based suprasound accurately estimates overnight respiratory rate vs thoracic band with ~0.97 correlation.
Why the study?
Existing respiratory monitoring approaches during sleep rely on contact-based sensors or dedicated hardware, limiting accessibility and longitudinal use.
Does a smartphone-based suprasound system accurately estimate respiratory rate during sleep compared to polysomnography in healthy participants?
Cross-Sectional (n=80)
No
Does a smartphone-based suprasound system accurately estimate respiratory rate during sleep compared to polysomnography in healthy participants?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.97, MAE 0.29 brpm
A consumer smartphone can contactlessly estimate respiratory rate during sleep with high accuracy, offering a viable alternative to contact-based sensors.
May enable accessible sleep respiratory monitoring; leaves open validation in clinical populations and longitudinal settings.
Respiratory monitoring during sleep is clinically valuable but existing approaches using contact-based sensors or dedicated hardware limit accessibility and longitudinal use. This study evaluated a smartphone-based system that emits a continuous pure tone suprasound signal (18–20 kHz) for contactless overnight respiratory monitoring, validated against a thoracic respiratory effort band (TREB) from polysomnography in 80 healthy participants. Respiratory signals were derived via in-phase/quadrature demodulation, with rate estimated by autocorrelation. A respiratory coherence score was developed to identify high-confidence segments without external reference, retaining 65% of sleep epochs. Within these epochs, respiratory rate agreement with the TREB yielded an ICC(2,1) of 0.97 and MAE of 0.29 brpm, and the derived signal showed a median absolute correlation of 0.85. Accuracy was comparable to Apple Watch estimates (ICC 0.95, MAE 0.46 brpm), with substantially greater temporal resolution. These results demonstrate that a consumer smartphone can contactlessly estimate respiratory rate during sleep with high accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldberg et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy participants (respiratory monitoring) (n=80). Smartphone-based pure tone suprasound (18-20 kHz) vs. Thoracic respiratory effort band (TREB) from polysomnography was evaluated on Respiratory rate agreement with thoracic respiratory effort band during high-confidence sleep epochs (ICC 0.97, MAE 0.29 brpm). A smartphone-based pure tone suprasound system accurately estimated overnight respiratory rate compared to a thoracic effort band, achieving an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 and a mean absolute error of 0.29 breaths per minute during high-confidence sleep epochs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: