Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro study reveals potent inhibition of cytomegalovirus and rhinovirus by novel oxazole derivatives, indicating their potential as targeted antiviral therapeutics.
A library of 16 new five‐functionalized derivatives of 2‐undecyl‐ and 1,2,4‐oxadiazole‐containing 2‐aryl‐4‐cyano‐1,3‐oxazoles was synthesized using α ‐acylamino‐ β , β ‐dichloroacrylonitriles as key building blocks, enabling efficient formation of diverse 1,3‐oxazole, oxadiazole–oxazole, and sulfonamide–oxazole systems. The antiviral potential was evaluated in vitro against rhinovirus 8 (HRV8), cytomegalovirus (HCMV), parainfluenza virus type 3 (HPIV‐3), and zoonotic encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV). Screening revealed distinct activity profiles: none of the compounds inhibited EMCV or HPIV‐3, while several demonstrated pronounced efficacy against HRV8 and HCMV. In concentration‐dependent assays, compounds 1, 7, 10, 13 , and 14 exhibited potent anti‐HCMV effects (IC 50 = 0.42–4.67 µM). Compound 7 showed remarkable selectivity (SI = 465), outperforming ganciclovir (GCV, SI = 326). Against HRV8, compound 2 was the most active (IC 50 = 1.67 µM, SI = 11), whereas compound 13 displayed weak activity (IC 50 = 21.0 µM, SI = 1). All molecules met drug‐likeness criteria with favorable ADMET‐predicted pharmacokinetic parameters. Molecular docking suggested that derivatives 7, 10, 13 , and 14 may target viral DNA polymerase, with binding energies from –8.8 to –9.7 kcal mol −1 . These findings demonstrate that 1,3‐oxazoles represent a promising chemotype for new antiviral candidates active against HCMV and HRV8.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rybina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: