Conceptual framework proposes functional airway phenotyping to evaluate perioperative complications in surgical patients, highlighting the value of integrating dynamic physiology with static anatomy.
Despite advances in airway assessment, the ability to predict perioperative airway-related complications remains limited. Current evaluation relies predominantly on static anatomical descriptors, although airway behavior results from the interaction of structural, physiological, biomechanical, and patient-specific determinants. We propose functional airway phenotyping (FAP) as a conceptual framework to integrate these complementary domains. FAP extends conventional anatomy-based airway assessment by linking airway structure with function through the integration of anatomical characteristics, physiological behavior, tissue mechanical properties, and patient-specific factors. Rather than representing a new bedside test or a validated classification system, FAP provides a structure–function framework to better understand why patients with similar anatomical characteristics may experience different airway-related outcomes. We discuss how multimodal assessment, including clinical history, imaging, dynamic airway evaluation, physiological surrogates, and emerging artificial intelligence–supported approaches, could support future individualized perioperative airway assessment. FAP provides a conceptual roadmap for integrating structure and function in perioperative airway assessment. Future studies should validate clinically meaningful Functional Airway Phenotyping and determine their role in precision perioperative airway management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: