Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper introduces a novel sensorimotor perspective to the study of smartphone engagement and dependency. While existing research on problematic smartphone use predominantly frames the issue around cognitive, social, and neurochemical reward mechanisms (particularly dopamine), this work argues that such accounts remain incomplete without addressing the physical interaction itself. The smartphone is not merely an information-delivery device; it is an interactive, in-hand tool that engages deeply established human capacities to grasp, manipulate, and respond to objects. By bringing together diverse strands of evidence (including the evolutionary history of tool use, the neural representation of tool-directed actions, and direct empirical data on haptic feedback and the "need for touch") this paper constructs a comprehensive five-layer conceptual scaffold. The primary contribution of this work is not just theoretical synthesis, but the formulation of an explicit, falsifiable empirical prediction regarding the role of tactile and sensorimotor feedback in digital engagement, distinguishing it from general cognitive or habit-based explanations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramin Saadat (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: