Decarbonizing aviation through sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) requires pathways that are both resource-efficient and regionally adaptable, particularly in water-limited areas. This study evaluates the life cycle sustainability of SAF produced from four biomass feedstocks—castor, soybean, corn stover, and switchgrass—through Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids, Fischer-Tropsch, and Alcohol-to-Jet pathways in the semi-arid Tongliao region of Northeast China. Life cycle assessment quantified water footprint (WF), carbon footprint, and soil carbon sequestration, and an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-based surrogate model was developed using castor as a case study to estimate crop-specific WFs within the observed climatic domain. Castor- and switchgrass-based SAF exhibited the lowest life cycle WFs (0.1571 and 0.1195 m 3 /MJ). Accounting for induced land use change and soil carbon sequestration, switchgrass-based fuel achieved net-negative emissions, whereas castor-based fuel reduced emissions by 88.12% compared with fossil jet fuel. Multi-criteria decision analysis integrating environmental, technical, economic, and social dimensions identified the castor-based pathway as the optimal SAF option, followed by corn stover-based and switchgrass-based pathways. These findings highlight the role of non-food, drought-tolerant feedstocks and AI-assisted modeling in guiding feedstock selection, process optimization, and policy formulation for SAF development in water-stressed regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: