Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Geothermal energy piles (GEPs) synergistically integrate structural load-bearing with subsurface heat exchange, yet their deployment in marine soft clay prevalent along China’s eastern coast introduces complex thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) challenges. Although the Modified Cam-Clay (MCC) model is extensively employed for such soils, regional parameter variability and quantitative sensitivity to energy pile performance remain insufficiently resolved. This study establishes a three-dimensional finite element model using COMSOL Multiphysics and conducts systematic sensitivity analysis by perturbing key MCC parameters (M, λ, and κ) within ±20% and ±40% around benchmark values for Shanghai marine soft clay. Results demonstrate that the compression index λ dominates pile head settlement control, with a ±40% perturbation inducing variations up to 0.7 mm—over five times more sensitive than M or κ—whereas all parameters exhibit negligible influence (<0.5%) on thermal exchange performance. Comparative analysis further reveals significant regional disparities, with Shanghai soft clay showing notably higher λ (0.29) and lower M (0.721) than Fuzhou, Shenzhen, and other coastal regions. Accordingly, for settlement-critical designs, λ should preferentially be determined from high-quality undisturbed sampling. Conservative λ values are to be used where uncertainties remain, laying a rigorous foundation for parameter-testing procedures and safety-factor calibration within GEP design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: