Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
September 17, 2026Journal of Mental HealthOpen Access

Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives on a transdiagnostic experience sampling and ecological momentary intervention protocol

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AKAdam KurillaDDDaniel DančíkRLRadoslav Lošonský

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Mixed-methods study demonstrates strong acceptability and utility of digital symptom tracking in mental health outpatients, highlighting the need for personalized monitoring protocols.

Key Points

  • To evaluate service user and clinician perspectives on the feasibility, usability, and clinical utility of a 30-day transdiagnostic experience sampling method (ESM) protocol paired with on-demand ecological momentary interventions (EMI).
  • Enrolled 89 service users in a 30-day ESM monitoring period within the DISCONNECT project, with 84 participants completing a post-monitoring debriefing questionnaire.
  • Conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 20 service users and 10 outpatient clinicians, analyzing data via content analysis and thematic content analysis.
  • Service users and clinicians reported ESM was acceptable and clinically valuable, demonstrating improvements in self-awareness, symptom understanding, psychoeducation, and clinical communication.
  • On-demand EMI received favorable qualitative appraisal but was used infrequently, prompting participants to request greater personalization, flexible scheduling, and context-sensitive interventions.
  • Implementation barriers included monitoring-related participant burden, clinician time constraints, and broader organizational challenges in outpatient clinics.

Cite This Study

Kurilla et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aabb7e75f706d05830e7403https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2026.2732883
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share