Key result
Single ventricle physiology is linked to ~26% lower indexed SVC flow versus biventricular physiology.
Why the study?
Patients with single ventricle congenital heart disease undergo surgical palliation that alters vascular flow dynamics, but differences in caval flow and wall shear stress compared to biventricular patients are not well characterized.
Does single ventricle physiology reduce caval flow and wall shear stress compared to biventricular physiology in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease?
Cohort (n=387)
No
Does single ventricle physiology reduce caval flow and wall shear stress compared to biventricular physiology in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease?
Single ventricle physiology intrinsically alters systemic venous return, resulting in lower caval flow and wall shear stress, which may predispose to long-term complications like thrombosis and endothelial dysfunction.
Aims Patients with single ventricle (SV) congenital heart disease typically undergo surgical palliation that reroutes superior/inferior vena cava (SVC/IVC) directly to the pulmonary arteries, which alter vascular flow dynamics. Four-dimensional flow (4DF) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), particularly with ferumoxytol contrast, enables comprehensive assessment of flow distribution and wall shear stress (WSS) in small pediatric vessels. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in caval flow and WSS between SV and BiV patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent clinically indicated ferumoxytol-enhanced (FE) 4DF CMR between 2019 and 2024. Patients with anomalous systemic or pulmonary venous return were excluded. 4DF data were evaluated on the cloud-based Tempus platform. Flow in the SVC, IVC, aorta and descending aorta was quantified and indexed to body surface area. The average WSS over time was measured. Results Among 387 patients (n = 126 for SV; n = 261 for BiV), SV patients had lower indexed SVC flow (1.11 ± 0.51 vs. 1.50 ± 0.69 L/min/m2, p < 0.0001) and lower WSS (16.0 ± 6.4 vs. 22.7 ± 9.1 cPa, p < 0.0001) compared to BiV patients. The SVC/caval flow ratio declined with age and body surface area, remaining independently lower in the SV group after multivariable adjustment (p = 0.0005). Conclusions SV physiology is associated with lower SVC flow and WSS independent of age or body size, suggesting altered systemic venous return intrinsic to cavopulmonary circulation. 4DF CMR is a valuable tool for assessing and monitoring systemic venous physiology in congenital heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Congenital heart disease (n=387). Single ventricle physiology vs. Biventricular physiology was evaluated on Indexed superior vena cava (SVC) flow (p=<0.0001). Single ventricle physiology was associated with significantly lower indexed superior vena cava flow and wall shear stress compared to biventricular physiology, independent of age or body size.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: