This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We report an unexpected conservation structure found in a preregistered 99-run survey (4096 steps each) of a nonlinear many-wave complete relational system extended from our minimal closed system [K1]. Although the anticipated relaxation-type evolution (floor, onset, saturation) did not occur - 5 runs are exact fixed points and 94 depart immediately - the complex quadratic sum of all relational waves is exactly conserved in every run: sum z_m^2 = C^2. This follows rigorously because each simultaneous update is a real orthogonal transformation generated by a real antisymmetric kernel. We read this as quadratic condensation: many internal waves are exactly represented by one complex quadratic quantity, and the closure form is invariant under hierarchical coarse-graining, sum_n C_n^2 = sumn,m zₙₘ^2. The simultaneous conservation of H and C^2 fixes the Gram matrix of the real and imaginary parts, with eigenvalues (H+-|C^2|)/2 and shape index chi=|C^2|/H in [0,1]; we prove chi=1 iff K=0 under connectivity, matching exactly the five frozen runs, and give a closed form chi(L,m_a,m_b) that reproduces all 99 measured values to machine precision. An antisymmetric quadratic flux J_nm=-J_mn governs exchange between condensates, and a single-valued relational phase U_AB with U_BA=U_AB⁻¹ and composition U_AB U_BC = U_AC defines directed local clocks on a double cover, with the two lifts +-i carrying the two time directions. Finally, squaring the fixed Gram 2-frame maps it to an ellipse with one focus at the origin whose eccentricity equals chi exactly; a three-component zero-closure embedding realizes any nondegenerate eccentricity 0<=e<1; and under a single explicit clock-readout axiom dt=r dtau, the Kepler equation, the area law, the inverse-square central force, and the third law n^2A^3=mu are reconstructed without assuming physical time or spatial coordinates as fundamental variables. Japanese and English versions (Markdown, LaTeX, PDF) are included.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noriaki Kihara (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: