Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benchmark study demonstrates superior convergence and diversity across complex optimization tasks, highlighting the utility of intermediate group-level guidance.
Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is a widely used bio-inspired optimization method. However, global guidance can align particle trajectories, reduce population diversity, and lead to premature convergence. To address this issue, we propose GRACE-PSO, a particle swarm optimizer based on group rank assessment and cooperative evolution. The method introduces group-best learning as an intermediate layer between personal-best and global-best learning to improve the balance between exploration and exploitation. GRACE-PSO integrates three coupled mechanisms: (1) a group-learning update that provides the population with multiple group-specific search directions; (2) a rank-based group-utility assessment that evaluates relative search effectiveness through pairwise comparisons of personal-best fitness values; and (3) a utility-driven adaptive strategy that adjusts the strengths of group-best and global-best learning and selectively reinitializes a small number of underperforming particles in stagnant groups. Experiments on 29 CEC 2017 benchmark functions at 30 and 50 dimensions against seven representative PSO methods show that GRACE-PSO achieves average ranks of 1.2414 and 1.3793, respectively. Experiments on two practical flexible intelligent metasurface optimization problems further demonstrate its competitive performance and practical applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: