Key result
Directly acting antiviral agents were safe in 400 HCV patients with midrange ejection fraction (40-49%), showing no significant adverse cardiovascular effects and improved insulin resistance.
Why the study?
Limited data is available about the effect of directly acting antiviral agents on the cardiovascular system in patients with midrange left ventricular ejection fraction infected with hepatitis C virus.
Do directly acting antiviral agents for HCV infection cause adverse cardiovascular effects in patients with midrange ejection fraction?
Cohort (n=400)
Yes
Do directly acting antiviral agents for HCV infection cause adverse cardiovascular effects in patients with midrange ejection fraction?
Directly acting antiviral regimens for HCV are safe in patients with midrange ejection fraction and are associated with beneficial metabolic changes such as improved insulin resistance.
Background: The Egyptian National Committee of Viral Hepatitis program is the leading national hepatitis C virus (HCV) management program globally. However, limited data is available about the effect of the new directly acting antiviral agents on the cardiovascular system. Objectives: Our study aimed to assess the safety of the relatively new directly acting antiviral agents approved by the National Health Committee in Egypt to treat patients infected with hepatitis C virus who have midrange left ventricular ejection fraction. Methods: This multicenter study included 400 successive patients with an ejection fraction (40-49%) from May 2017 to December 2019. We classified them into two groups: Group I (Child A), who received Sofosbuvir and Daclatasvir for twelve weeks, and Group II (Child B), who received Sofosbuvir, Daclatasvir, and Ribavirin for twelve weeks. Patients were evaluated for their symptoms, ejection fraction, brain natriuretic peptide, lipid profile, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance levels, and Holter monitoring (just before the start of treatment and within three days after completing therapy). Results: We found New York Heart Association Class, ejection fraction, brain natriuretic peptide, premature ventricular contractions burden, as well as highest and lowest heart rate did not show a statistically significant difference in both groups after treatment. The treatment did not cause bradycardia or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Fasting blood glucose and fasting insulin levels declined, with improved insulin resistance after treatment in both groups. Both low and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased after treatment in Group II. Conclusions: Both regimens of directly acting antiviral agents used in Egypt to treat chronic hepatitis C virus infection are safe in patients with New York Heart Association Class I and II with midrange left ventricular ejection fraction (40-49%). There are beneficial metabolic changes following HCV clearance as an improvement of insulin resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alaarag et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Hepatitis C virus infection with midrange left ventricular ejection fraction (n=400). Directly acting antiviral agents (Sofosbuvir and Daclatasvir +/- Ribavirin) vs. Pre-treatment baseline was evaluated on Cardiovascular safety (NYHA class, ejection fraction, BNP, PVC burden, heart rate). Directly acting antiviral agents were safe in 400 HCV patients with midrange ejection fraction (40-49%), showing no significant adverse cardiovascular effects and improved insulin resistance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: