Key result
Switching Fidelis and LV lead pins during CRT-D replacement maintains function and prevents inappropriate shocks.
Why the study?
In patients with a functional Sprint Fidelis lead at CRT-D generator replacement, the risk of inappropriate shocks from future lead failure remains, and alternative management strategies are needed.
Does switching the Fidelis lead pace/sense IS-1 pin with the bipolar LV lead IS-1 pin prevent inappropriate shocks from lead failure in fragile CRT-D patients?
Case Report (n=6)
Does switching the Fidelis lead pace/sense IS-1 pin with the bipolar LV lead IS-1 pin prevent inappropriate shocks from lead failure in fragile CRT-D patients?
Switching the Fidelis lead pace/sense pin with the bipolar LV lead pin at CRT-D generator replacement is a feasible approach to prevent inappropriate shocks from future lead failure in fragile patients.
May avert shocks in fragile CRT-D patients via pin switching; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
AIMS: In patients with a functional Sprint Fidelis lead at generator replacement, the manufacturer recommended to either continue to use the existing lead or replace it with a new lead. For those patients who continue to use a functional Fidelis lead, the risk of inappropriate shocks remains present if the lead fails in the future. We evaluated the feasibility of an alternative approach at the time of cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) generator replacement in patients with a functional bipolar left ventricular (LV) lead for prevention of inappropriate shocks from future Fidelis lead failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: During the procedure, the pace/sense IS-1 connection pin of the functional Fidelis lead was intentionally inserted into the LV port of the new CRT-D generator, while the existing bipolar LV lead IS-1 connection pin was inserted into the right ventricular (RV) pace/sense port. After such switching, the existing bipolar LV lead was used for functional LV pacing/sensing, while the Fidelis lead was used for functional RV pacing and high voltage shock only and could no longer be used for the purpose of sensing and detecting. This approach precluded oversensing and inappropriate shocks should the functional Fidelis lead fail in the future. Six fragile patients, who were not considered suitable candidates for lead replacement, underwent the alternative approach. During a follow-up of 35 ± 23 months, the CRT-D system functioned normally in five patients. The Fidelis lead fractured in one patient 7 months after generator replacement. The malfunction was detected promptly and the defected lead was replaced. No inappropriate detections or shock was triggered. CONCLUSIONS: In CRT-D patients with a functional Fidelis lead and a bipolar LV lead, switching of the Fidelis lead pace/sense IS-1 pin with the bipolar LV lead IS-1 pin at generator replacement did not affect normal system function. This novel approach may be valuable in fragile patients with high risk of sudden death for prevention of inappropriate shocks triggered by oversensing from a malfunctioning Fidelis lead.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2016) conducted a case report in CRT-D patients with a functional Sprint Fidelis lead and a bipolar LV lead (n=6). Switching of Fidelis lead pace/sense IS-1 pin with bipolar LV lead IS-1 pin was evaluated on Normal system function and prevention of inappropriate shocks. Switching the Fidelis lead pace/sense pin with the bipolar LV lead pin at CRT-D generator replacement maintained normal system function and prevented inappropriate shocks in 6 fragile patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: