Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation has minor influence on long-term lifestyle adherence, which depends primarily on personal interest.
Why the study?
Further insight into patients’ perspectives on lifestyle after cardiac rehabilitation is needed as changing habits following heart disease is a complex matter.
What are the characteristics of lifestyle and patient perspectives after completing a cardiac rehabilitation programme?
What are the characteristics of lifestyle and patient perspectives after completing a cardiac rehabilitation programme?
Cardiac rehabilitation has limited long-term impact on lifestyle adherence unless recommendations align with patients' interests and are perceived as manageable in everyday life.
Positive cardiac rehab experiences may not sustain lifestyle changes; leaves open personalized adherence strategies for prospective trials.
Lifestyle following heart disease is considered important to prevent and reduce cardiovascular risk factors. Thus, cardiac rehabilitation is focused on potential lifestyle changes. Further insight into patients’ perspective on lifestyle after cardiac rehabilitation is needed as changing habits following heart disease is a complex matter. The objective of this study was to explore the characteristics of lifestyle after cardiac rehabilitation. A phenomenological-hermeneutic approach with qualitative interviews was performed in 20 patients six months after completing a hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation programme in 2012 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The patients were diagnosed with ischemic heart disease, heart failure or left heart valve disease. The interviews were analysed using the interpretation theory by Ricoeur. The variation in reactions to cardiac rehabilitation were: 1) considering prior lifestyle to be appropriate, maybe with minor adjustments; 2) acknowledging the need for incorporating lifestyle changes; and 3) reconciling or feeling guilt when being unable to manage changes. Participation in the cardiac rehabilitation programme was a positive experience, but it had minor influence on long-term adherence to recommended lifestyle. The important thing in establishing new routines was whether they aroused interest, and whether the experience of changes was perceived as necessary and manageable. In future cardiac rehabilitation, focusing on patients’ interests and supporting them in incorporating recommendations into their everyday life might be essential following heart disease, also after ending cardiac rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knudsen et al. (2014) studied Ischemic heart disease, heart failure, or left heart valve disease (n=20). Cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Patients' perspective on characteristics of lifestyle after cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiac rehabilitation was a positive experience but had minor influence on long-term adherence to recommended lifestyle changes, which depended on personal interest and perceived manageability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: