This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction.Previous studies on the association of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms with cutaneous melanoma risk reported conflicting results.Objective.To obtain a more precise assessment of the associations, we performed a meta-analysis of previously published studies.Material and methods.We searched for eligible studies in the PubMed, Embase, and CNKI databases.A total of 40 case-control studies with 1,144 cases and 2,925 controls were included.Results.The pooled analyses suggested a significant association between the FokI C>T and BsmI G>A polymorphisms of the VDR gene and susceptibility to melanoma.However, we found that the VDR TaqI T>C, EcoRV A>G, ApaI G>T, and Cdx2 G>A polymorphisms were not associated with melanoma risk. Conclusions.The meta-analysis suggests that VDR FokI C>T and BsmI G>A polymorphisms are significantly associated with melanoma risk, while TaqI T>C, EcoRV A>G, ApaI G>T, and Cdx2 G>A polymorphisms are not associated with melanoma risk. StreSZcZeNieWprowadzenie.Dotychczasowe badania analizujące związek między polimorfizmami genu kodującego receptor witaminy D (VDR) a ryzykiem rozwoju czerniaka skóry przyniosły sprzeczne wyniki.Cel pracy.W celu uzyskania bardziej precyzyjnego obrazu tych zależności przeprowadzono metaanalizę opublikowanych do tej pory badań. Materiał i metody. Publikacje kwalifikujące się do metaanalizy wyszukano w bazach
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niktabar et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: