The sol-gel and hydrothermal methods were adopted to synthesize β-NiMoO4 and α-NiMoO4 respectively, which were characterized by XRD and H2-TPR. Their catalytic performances for oxidative dehydrogenation of propane were tested. The results indicated that the crystal structure of catalysts obtained from different preparation methods was different; thereby there was a great variation in the catalytic performance. The β-NiMoO4 catalyst prepared by the sol-gel method exhibited the better catalytic performance for oxidative dehydrogenation of propane under the low temperature, over which the propylene yield can attain 9.47% at 450°C, than that of α-NiMoO4 prepared by the hydrothermal method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baoyi et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: