Erickcek, Kamionkowski and Carroll proposed in 2008 that the dipole modulation of the CMB could be due to a very large scale perturbation of the field ϕ causing the primordial curvature perturbation. We repeat their calculation using weaker assumptions and the current data. If ϕ is the inflaton of any single-field inflation with the attractor behaviour, the asymmetry is almost certainly too small. If instead ϕ is any curvaton-type field (ie. one with the canonical kinetic term and a negligible effect during inflation) the asymmetry can agree with observation if | f NL | in the equilateral configuration is ≃ 10 for k −1 = 1Gpc and ≲3 for k −1 = 1Mpc. An f NL with these properties can apparently be obtained from the curvaton with an axionic potential. Within any specific curvaton-type model, the function f NL ( k 1 , k 2 , k 3 ) required to generate the asymmetry would be determined, and could perhaps already be confirmed or ruled out using existing Planck or WMAP data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2013 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: