Biofilms are the most common mode of bacterial growth in nature and the formation will occur on organic or inorganic solid surfaces in contact with a liquid. The aims of this study were, by combining numeration and sessile drop technique, (i) to characterize the structural dynamics of dairy biofilm growth and the physico chemical properties on silicone and stainless steel and (ii) to evaluate the impact of bio-adhesion on chemistry of surfaces at different times of contact (2, 7, 9 and 24 h). Significantly, greater biofilm volumes were observed after 48 h on two materials. Gram-positive bacteria and fungal population exhibited a significantly higher biofilm organization than gram-negative (43–64%). Elsewhere, after 48 h, results showed a slight difference on gram-negative adhered cells on stainless steel than silicone (2.6 × 107 cfu/cm2 and 4.7 × 105 cfu/cm2, respectively). Moreover, the physico chemical properties of the surfaces showed that the silicone and stainless steel have a hydrophobic character (Giwi = −68.28 mJ/m2 and −57.6 mJ/m2, respectively). Also, both the surfaces present a weak electron donor character (γ − = 2.2 mJ/m2 and 4.1 mJ/m2, respectively). The real-time investigation of the impact of dairy biofilm on the physico chemical properties of the materials has shown a decrease of hydrophobicity degree of the silicone surface that becomes hydrophilic (ΔGiwi = 11.47 mJ/m2) after 7 h and the increase of electron donor character (γ − = 75.8 mJ/m2). Elsewhere, bio-adhesion on stainless steel was accompanied with a decrease of hydrophobicity degree of the surface, which becomes hydrophilic after 7 h of contact (ΔGiwi = 6.62 mJ/m2) and the increase of the electron donor character (γ − = 44.8 mJ/m2). While, after 24 h of contact, results showed a decrease of the hydrophilicity degree and surface energy components of silicone and stainless steel that become hydrophobic (ΔGiwi = −21.2 mJ/m2 and ΔGiwi = −56.51 mJ/m2, respectively) and weak electron donor (γ − = 14.0 and 2.3 mJ/m2, respectively).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ksontini et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: