Free-swimming zoospores of several isolates of the oomycetous water mould Achlya demonstrate mutual attraction (adelphotaxis) which may result in auto-aggregation. In the apparent absence of exogenous chemotactic signals macroscopic globular aggregates or microscopic plaques of cysts are formed. Auto-aggregation was favoured by high concentrations of zoospores in suspension; the growth rate of spontaneous aggregates was estimated at 4–10 × 103spores min−1; growth of an aggregate was limited to about 7 min. By means of chemotactic assays, attractant activity for zoospores was detected in the vicinity of aggregates, and in zoospore or cyst supernatants. The attractant activity extracted from spore aggregates was heat-stable. In the absence of exogenous nutrients, the macroscopic aggregates of an homothallic isolate produced sporangia and oogonia. Aggregation was readily initiated as a result of zoospore chemotaxis towards capillary tubes containing exogenous attractant in an agar medium. Aggregating zoospores frequently assumed a slender swarm configuration moving directly towards the aggregate at the capillary-tube tip. Analysis of video recordings showed that many zoospores joining the swarm were attracted directly by the swarm rather than by the exogenous attractant. Such aggregation was a time-limited process, the duration of which was extended by the presence of amino acids in the zoospore suspension. Under natural conditions zoospore aggregation may be a dual-component chemotactic process triggered by exogenous attractants and amplified by chemical signals from the aggregating spores. The possible consequences of adelphotaxis and auto-aggregate formation, namely enhanced inoculum potential, syngamy and spore production, are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: