Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To describe a 3D-printed middle ear model that quantifies the force applied to the modeled incus. To compare the forces applied during placement and crimping of a stapes prosthesis between the Robotic ENT Microsurgery System ( REMS) and the freehand technique in this model. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective feasibility study. SETTING: Robotics laboratory. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A middle ear model was designed and 3D printed to facilitate placement and crimping of a piston prosthesis. The modeled incus was mounted to a 6-degree of freedom force sensor to measure forces/torques applied on the incus. Six participants-1 fellowship-trained neurotologist, 2 neurotology fellows, and 3 otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residents-placed and crimped a piston prosthesis in this model, 3 times freehand and 3 times REMS assisted. Maximum force applied to the incus was then calculated for prosthesis placement and crimping from force/torque sensor readings for each trial. Robotic and freehand outcomes were compared with a linear regression model. RESULTS: Mean maximum magnitude of force during prosthesis placement was 126.4 ± 73.6 mN and 105.0 ± 69.4 mN for the freehand and robotic techniques, respectively ( P = .404). For prosthesis crimping, the mean maximum magnitude of force was 469.3 ± 225.2 mN for the freehand technique and 272.7 ± 97.4 mN for the robotic technique ( P = .049). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data demonstrate that REMS-assisted stapes prosthesis placement and crimping are feasible with a significant reduction in maximum force applied to the incus during crimping with the REMS in comparison with freehand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Razavi et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: