Background Anaphylaxis is a serious systemic hypersensitivity reaction requiring prompt recognition and treatment, yet diagnosis-linked national surveillance is unavailable in many countries. Epinephrine auto-injector (EAI) dispensing cannot identify confirmed events or individual patients, but it is an epidemiologically relevant medication-use endpoint because EAIs are supplied to people with prior anaphylaxis or a clinically judged risk of future anaphylaxis. Objective To quantify nationwide EAI dispensing in Greece as a drug-utilization and emergency-treatment-preparedness benchmark and, secondarily, derive scenario-based incidence-compatible and prevalence-equivalent indicators relevant to the epidemiology of anaphylaxis. Methods This nationwide retrospective drug-utilization study analyzed aggregated net Anapen® DUO pack counts from reimbursed and non-reimbursed retail and hospital pharmacy channels during March 2015-March 2017, when it was the only EAI marketed nationally. Directly observed pack flow was primary, utilization by EAI strength was analyzed at the population level using age-equivalent denominators, expiry timing was examined conditionally, and scenario outputs were deterministic sensitivity analyses. Results During 25 months, 33,986 twin-packs were recorded (153.2 packs per 100,000 person-years). The final 12-month rate was 154.0 per 100,000 population. Using age-equivalent population denominators, 150-microgram dispensing intensity was 5.8-fold higher than 300-microgram intensity. Reference scenarios yielded an incidence-compatible anaphylaxis indicator of 47.7–125.3 episodes per 100,000 person-years and prevalence-equivalent active EAI coverage of 51.7–133.0 persons per 100,000. Deliberately broader assumption ranges widened these to 17.0–229.8 and 19.7–177.3, respectively. Conclusion Nationwide EAI dispensing provides the first all-age benchmark of access to community emergency epinephrine in Greece. By combining observed pack flow with transparent scenario-based analyses, this study introduces a reproducible approach for gaining insights into anaphylaxis epidemiology and emergency-treatment preparedness from national dispensing data, particularly where comprehensive registries are unavailable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
George Ν. Konstantinou (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: