Background/Objectives: Breast reconstruction (BR) following mastectomy plays a critical role in post-cancer care by offering both physical and psychological benefits. Despite advancements in techniques and shared decision-making (SDM), BR uptake remains inconsistent. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on objective (medical and socioeconomic) and subjective (psychological and personal) factors influencing BR decision-making among women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, OVID, and Google Scholar, identifying peer-reviewed studies published between January 2013 and 25 July 2024. Eligible studies examined determinants of BR decisions in women undergoing therapeutic mastectomy, excluding perspectives of non-patient stakeholders and post-decision outcomes. The risk of bias and study quality were assessed using the Quality Appraisal for Diverse Studies (QuADS) tool. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023456198) and followed PRISMA guidelines. Results: Twenty-seven studies comprising 994,528 participants across 16 countries met the inclusion criteria. The objective factors included age, comorbidities, insurance coverage, physician recommendations, and healthcare access. The subjective factors encompassed body image concerns, self-esteem, fear of recurrence, and emotional readiness. Younger age, private insurance, and active physician counseling were associated with increased BR uptake, while older age, lack of information, and financial or logistical barriers reduced uptake. Regional disparities were noted across healthcare systems. Conclusions: BR decisions are influenced by complex, interrelated clinical, psychological, and systemic factors. Integrating SDM tools, enhancing patient education, and addressing healthcare inequities are essential for supporting informed and equitable BR decision-making. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies and policy interventions to improve access to and patient satisfaction with BR outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bochtsou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: