Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess a quality improvement disparity reduction intervention and its sustainability. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Electronic health records and Quality Index database of Clalit Health Services in Israel (2008-2012). STUDY DESIGN: Interrupted time-series with pre-, during, and postintervention disparities measurement between 55 target clinics (serving approximately 400,000 mostly low socioeconomic, minority populations) and all other (126) clinics. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data on a Quality Indicator Disparity Scale (QUIDS-7) of 7 indicators, and on a 61-indicator scale (QUIDS-61). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The gap between intervention and nonintervention clinics for QUIDS-7 decreased by 66.7 percent and by 70.4 percent for QUIDS-61. Disparity reduction continued (18.2 percent) during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement can achieve significant reduction in disparities in a wide range of clinical domains, which can be sustained over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balicer et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: