Key result
Females show thicker subcutaneous fat than males across all 54 measured body points.
Why the study?
The distribution and sexual differences of subcutaneous fat thickness in Japanese young adults were not well characterized using ultrasonic measurement.
Cross-Sectional (n=125)
p-value: p=<0.01
Ultrasonic measurement reveals significant sex differences in the distribution and thickness of subcutaneous fat in young Japanese adults.
Sex-specific fat distribution patterns may inform anthropometric norms; hypothesis-generating for cardiometabolic links, needing prospective validation.
Utilizing an ultrasonic device (B-mode, 7.5MHz), the thickness of subcutaneous fat was measured at 54 different points in the bodies of 59 males (aged 20-25) and 66 females (aged 20-23). The results were as follows: 1. The females had significantly thicker subcutaneous fat than those of the males at every point measured. 2. The thick subcutaneous fats were observed at the abdomen, buttocks, and the anterior and medial parts of the thigh in the males, and at the breast, buttocks, abdomen, the posterior, medial, and anterior parts of the thigh, and the anterior, medial, and posterior parts of the upperarm in the females, respectively. 3. The subcutaneous fat of both sexes was more likely to be thicker in body parts closer to the trunk than the extremities. 4. The correlation coefficient between the percent body fat and the mean thickness of subcutaneous fat obtained from data was 0.91 for the males and 0.83 for the females.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maruyama et al. (1991) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (Subcutaneous fat distribution) (n=125). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Subcutaneous fat thickness at 54 body points (p=<0.01). Females had significantly thicker subcutaneous fat than males at all 54 measured body points, with distinct regional distribution patterns observed between sexes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: