SETTING: Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) offers children protection against tuberculosis (TB), but it has been difficult to implement, particularly in developing countries. OBJECTIVE: To understand what encourages or inhibits children from adhering to IPT. DESIGN: In-depth interviews were conducted with two parents of children adherent to IPT and two staff members from three primary health care clinics in high TB prevalence communities. Themes explored were knowledge and attitudes towards IPT, problems in accessing and adhering to treatment, and community responses. RESULTS: Parents administering treatment valued it positively, realised their children's risk of TB, and were positive about the clinic. Nurses acknowledged that resistance to treatment remained, with some parents not wanting to acknowledge risk nor willing to make the effort for their children; there was also considerable misinformation about IPT. Clinic nurses acknowledged problems of staff shortages, lengthy waiting times and conflict between staff and community members. Adherence was affected by social problems, stigma about TB and its link to the human immunodeficiency virus, and the extended treatment period. CONCLUSION: Parents who maintained adherence to the IPT regimen showed that it was possible even in very difficult circumstances. Further effort is required to improve some of the clinic services, correct misinformation, reduce stigma and provide support to parents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skinner et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: