Nerve regeneration was examined in rat molars that were briefly extracted and then replanted in the socket for 1-90 days. Immunocytochemistry was used to evaluate neural and nonneural immunoreactivity (IR) for low affinity nerve growth factor receptor (p75-NGFR) and for laminin and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Three different types of pulpal response to replantation were found. Type I: Some replanted teeth had mild injury and still contained coronal odontoblasts and associated fibroblasts that retained p75-NGFR-IR; they continued regular dentin formation and had excellent reinnervation. Type II: Teeth with intermediate injury lost most or all of the coronal pulp tissue, but they regenerated odontoblast-like cells that formed irregular dentin, they had numerous dispersed p75-NGFR-IR fibroblasts in crown pulp during early regeneration, and they had excellent reinnervation. Type III: Severely injured teeth lost their original pulp; they filled with dense connective tissue and bone and had poor reinnervation. After Type I or II injury the Schwann cells around degenerating myelinated and unmyelinated axons had increased expression of p75-NGFR by 1-3 days. By 7-10 days those Schwann cells had formed hollow tubes (bands of Bungner) along the degenerating axon tracks. They maintained their increased p75-NGFR-IR during and after regeneration of unmyelinated axons, whereas Schwann cells involved in remyelination lost p75-NGFR-IR at that stage. The number of CGRP-IR axons in the regenerating pulp increased from 7 to 90 days. Laminin-IR increased in all replanted teeth at 3-10 days and only returned to normal patterns in teeth with Type I or Type II response at 20-90 days. The special p75-NGFR-IR of pulpal fibroblasts of adult rat molars did not usually persist in regenerated, reinnervated pulp. The extensive depletion of fibroblast p75-NGFR-IR and the continuing enhanced p75-NGFR-IR in unmyelinated nerve fibers at 90 days show that altered growth factor conditions characterize regenerated pulp of replanted teeth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byers et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: