Regioselective 1,3‐Dipolar Cycloadditions of a ‘Thiocarbonyl‐methanide’ ((Alkylidenesulfonio)methanide) with Aromatic Sulfines Reaction of the spirocyclic 2,5‐dihydro‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole 7 and thiobenzophenone S‐oxide (6a) in THF at 45° yielded the spirocyclic 1,3‐dithiolane 1‐oxide 8, thiirane 9, and the diazane derivative 10 in a ratio of 61:15:23 (Scheme 2). The formation of 8 is rationalized by a 1,3‐dipolar cycloaddition of ‘thiocarbonyl‐methanide’ 1, generated from 7 by thermal elimination of N2, and the CS bond of sulfine 6a. Cyclization of intermediate 1 leads to thiirane 9. Under the same conditions, 7 and adamantane‐2‐thione S‐oxide (6b) or 2,2,4,4‐tetramethyl‐3‐thioxocyclobutanone S‐oxide (4) reacted to give only 9 and 10 but no cycloadduct of type 8 (Scheme 4). With the aim to favor the formation of 8, a mixture of 6a and 1.1 equiv. of 7 was heated to 45° without any solvent in a sealed tube. The ratio of products was only slightly different from that of the thermolysis in THF. An analogous experiment with 7 and 9H‐fluorene‐9‐thione S‐oxide (6c) yielded cycloadduct 13 and 9 (Scheme 5). It is most interesting that the 1,3‐dipolar cycloadditions of 1 and the sulfines 6a and 6c proceeded with different regioselectivity. A reaction mechanism for the unexpected formation of 10 is proposed in Scheme 7. The key step is the base‐catalyzed ring opening of 7 and the nucleophilic addition of the thereby formed thiolate 21 onto the sulfonium ion 19.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mlostoń et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: