Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study demonstrates superior trajectory tracking and stability in quadrotor helicopters under turbulence, indicating robust real-time flight capability.
Robust altitude tracking and attitude stabilization of a quadrotor helicopter (QH) operating in dynamic and uncertain environments remain challenging due to unknown external disturbances, time-varying parametric uncertainties, and practical actuator and sensor constraints. To address these challenges, this article proposes a neural-enhanced sliding-mode control (NE-SMC) framework that integrates a lightweight multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP-NN) with an SMC backbone within a unified adaptive control architecture. The neural module employs a sliding-mode-inspired weight-update law to enable real-time compensation for disturbances and uncertainties without requiring explicit disturbance models or prior knowledge of system parameters, thereby strengthening system-level robustness and adaptability. A rigorous Lyapunov-based analysis guarantees closed-loop stability and finite-time convergence of the tracking errors. Extensive high-fidelity simulations, including deterministic scenarios and a 100-run Monte Carlo study, are conducted under severe wind disturbances and turbulent conditions, up to 25% mass and inertia variations, actuator saturation, and sensor constraints. Comparative results demonstrate that the proposed NE-SMC achieves substantially improved tracking accuracy and robustness compared with standard SMC and conventional hybrid SMC (H-SMC) schemes. Specifically, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) is reduced by 83.3%–88.9% relative to standard SMC and by 75%–87.5% relative to conventional H-SMC. These results confirm that the proposed framework provides a robust, constraint-aware, and computationally efficient control solution suitable for real-time QH applications, aligning with the requirements of intelligent systems in complex, uncertain environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ullah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: