Key result
Plantar mechanical stimulation increases baroreflex involvement in regulating cardiovascular variability in Parkinson's disease patients.
Why the study?
Causality analysis applied to cardiovascular variability may identify improvements in autonomic control linked to plantar mechanical stimulation in Parkinson's disease patients.
Does plantar mechanical stimulation improve autonomic control (baroreflex) in patients with Parkinson's disease?
Does plantar mechanical stimulation improve autonomic control (baroreflex) in patients with Parkinson's disease?
Model-free causality analysis can detect improvements in baroreflex control following plantar mechanical stimulation in Parkinson's disease patients, highlighting the importance of accounting for nonlinear dynamics.
Supports investigation of plantar stimulation for baroreflex issues in PD; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
We tested the hypothesis that causality analysis, applied to the spontaneous beat-to-beat variability of heart period (HP) and systolic arterial pressure (SAP), can identify the improvement of autonomic control linked to plantar mechanical stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). A causality index, measuring the strength of the association from SAP to HP variability, and derived according to the Granger paradigm (i.e. SAP causes HP if the inclusion of SAP into the set of signals utilized to describe cardiovascular interactions improves the prediction of HP series), was calculated using both linear model-based (MB) and nonlinear model-free (MF) approaches. Univariate HP and SAP variability indices in time and frequency domains, and bivariate descriptors of the HP-SAP variability interactions were computed as well. We studied ten PD patients (age range: 57-78 years; Hoehn-Yahr scale: 2-3; six males, four females) without orthostatic hypotension or symptoms of orthostatic intolerance and 'on-time' according to their habitual pharmacological treatment. PD patients underwent recordings at rest in a supine position and during a head-up tilt before, and 24 h after, mechanical stimulation was applied to the plantar surface of both feet. The MF causality analysis indicated a greater involvement of baroreflex in regulating HP-SAP variability interactions after mechanical stimulation. Remarkably, MB causality and more traditional univariate or bivariate techniques could not detect changes in cardiovascular regulation after mechanical stimulation, thus stressing the importance of accounting for nonlinear dynamics in PD patients. Due to the higher statistical power of MF causality we suggest its exploitation to monitor the baroreflex control improvement in PD patients, and we encourage the clinical application of the Granger causality approach to evaluate the modification of the autonomic control in relation to the application of a pharmacological treatment, a rehabilitation procedure or external intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bassani et al. (2014) studied Parkinson's disease (n=10). Plantar mechanical stimulation vs. Before stimulation was evaluated on Causality index measuring the strength of the association from systolic arterial pressure to heart period variability. Plantar mechanical stimulation increased baroreflex involvement in regulating cardiovascular variability in Parkinson's disease patients, as detected by nonlinear model-free causality analysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: