The prolific Ti 3 Co 5 B 2 structure type has produced exciting materials with tunable magnetic properties, ranging from soft magnetic Ti 2 FeRh 5 B 2, to semihard magnetic Ti 2 FeRu 4 RhB 2 and hard magnetic Sc 2 FeRu 3 Ir 2 B 2 . Density functional theory (DFT) was employed to investigate their spin–orbit coupling effect, spin exchange, and magnetic dipole–dipole interactions in order to understand their magnetic anisotropy and relate it to their various coercivities, with the objective of being able to predict new materials with large magnetic anisotropy. Our calculations show that the contribution of magnetic dipole–dipole interactions to the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy (MAE) in Ti 3 Co 5 B 2 -type compounds is much weaker than the spin–orbit coupling effect, and Sc 2 FeRu 3 Ir 2 B 2 has, by far, the largest MAE and strong intrachain and interchain Fe–Fe spin exchange coupling, thus confirming its hard magnetic properties. We then targeted materials containing the more earth-abundant and less expensive Co, instead of Rh, Ru or Ir, so that our study started with Ti 3 Co 5 B 2, which we found to be nonmagnetic. In the next step, substitutions on the Ti sites in Ti 3 Co 5 B 2 led to new potential quaternary phases with the general formula T 2 T′Co 5 B 2 (T = Ti, Hf; T′ = Mn, Fe). For Hf 2 MnCo 5 B 2, we found a large MAE (+0.96 meV/f.u.) but relatively weak interchain Mn–Mn spin exchange interactions, whereas for Hf 2 FeCo 5 B 2, there is a relatively smaller MAE (+0.17 meV/f.u.) but strong Fe–Fe interchain and intrachain spin exchange interactions. Therefore, these two Co-rich phases are predicted to be new rare-earth-free, semihard to hard magnetic materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: