Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the bioequivalence (BE) between Izaban® (test) and Jardiance® (reference) empagliflozin 25 mg, oral tablets, in healthy adult subjects. Materials and Methods: A randomized, open-label, two-sequence, and two-period crossover comparative oral bioavailability study was conducted on healthy adult subjects. It was tested BE in vivo using a comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation. Serial blood samples were collected up to 72 h following oral administration of the study drugs, plasma concentrations of empagliflozin were using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) method. Results: The test and reference drug products were considered bioequivalent when the geometric means of the test (T)/reference (R) ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) fall within the range of 80.00–125.00%. For PK parameters, % T/R ratios and 90% CIs were Cmax: 105.11% (100.28–110.18%), area under curve (AUC0-t): 103.25% (99.62–107.00%), and AUC0-∞ 102.71% (99.26–106.28%). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated in vivo BE between the two empagliflozin formulations tested in healthy subjects under fasting conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peña et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: