Key result
CAD is linked to reduced atrial blood flow in ~63% of patients compared to controls.
Why the study?
Similar angiographic methods for measuring atrial coronary artery blood flow have not been developed to assess differences in atrial blood flow between patients with and without coronary artery disease.
Does atrial blood flow differ between patients with and without coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=36)
Does atrial blood flow differ between patients with and without coronary artery disease?
Atrial blood flow, measurable by novel angiographic indices (atrial frame count and atrial perfusion score), is significantly reduced in patients with coronary artery disease compared to those without.
CAD-associated atrial hypoperfusion should not yet change practice; leaves open atrial ischemia as contributor to arrhythmias.
BACKGROUND: The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count and TIMI perfusion grade are measures of epicardial and microvascular ventricular coronary artery blood flow, respectively. Similar angiographic methods for measuring atrial coronary artery blood flow have not been developed. OBJECTIVE: To utilize two new angiographic measures of atrial blood flow (ABF), the atrial frame count (AFC) and the atrial perfusion score (APS), to determine whether ABF differs between patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: The AFC was defined as the number of frames for dye to reach standardized, distal atrial arterial landmarks during coronary angiography. The APS was utilized as a measure of microvascular atrial perfusion. AFCs were measured in 36 patients prior to isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), isolated valve surgery or in control patients (with neither CAD nor valvular disease). RESULTS: Sinus node artery and left atrial branch AFCs were higher (that is, ABF was reduced) in patients with CAD undergoing CABG than in those undergoing valve surgery (P < 0.05) or in control patients (P < 0.05). The APS was reduced in 63% of CAD patients but in only 5% of those without CAD (P < 0.001). The severity of CAD was a significant predictor of decreased ABF independent of the degree of proximal epicardial stenosis (P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: ABF is measurable with the AFC and APS. A significant reduction in ABF is present in patients with CAD undergoing CABG compared to patients without CAD. This reduction appears to be related to the overall severity of CAD independent of the degree of proximal stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maisel et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=36). Coronary artery disease vs. No coronary artery disease (valve surgery or controls) was evaluated on Reduced atrial perfusion score (APS) (p=<0.001). Coronary artery disease was associated with significantly reduced atrial blood flow, with reduced atrial perfusion scores in 63% of CAD patients compared to 5% of those without CAD (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: