Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is a longstanding open question regarding how patients with inflammatory bowel diseases can best optimize their diet to maintain overall health, avoid triggering of symptoms, and support remission. However, to date there is limited evidence in support of comprehensive dietary recommendations for these patients. Experience with highly restrictive elimination diets indicates that diet-based therapy can be as effective as first-line medical therapy for many patients; however, such diets cannot be maintained over the lifetime. A new approach is needed to enable patients to maintain healthy and effective diets through less restrictive nutrition plans. The major challenge to date has been the variable individual response to specific foods; for one patient, a particular food may trigger symptoms while for another patient, that same food may be inert or even therapeutic. The process of determining which foods would be best for which patients remains based in trial and error at present due to the lack of biomarkers to predict or measure individual biological responses to foods. Recent technological advances enable a precision nutrition approach, in which personalized, optimized diets are be tailored to the biological, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics. Here, we describe a framework to advance precision nutrition for inflammatory bowel diseases though 4 synergistic approaches: clinical trials of evidence-based anti-inflammatory diets; identification of biomarkers to predict or measure responses to different diets; identification of dietary triggers of disease; and development of analytical tools based on artificial intelligence to predict response to food. We believe the time is right to create the evidence base and tools necessary to develop diets tailored to the clinical, lifestyle, and biological characteristics of patients as a novel and effective approach to improve disease outcomes. “What should I eat?” is one of the most common questions patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) ask their doctors. Yet there is not a conclusive answer to this question and dietary recommendations for IBD patients remain based largely on trial and error for each individual patient.1 The goals for any nutrition plan for IBD are typically to provide a healthy diet while preventing exacerbation of symptoms and/or disease relapse once medical treatment has induced clinical remission.2 The immediate challenge to this seemingly simple objective is that patients can respond differently to the same food. While a certain food can be a trigger in a given patient, in other patients the same food can be therapeutic, leading to symptom improvement or relapse prevention. This is in part due to the fact that IBD is a highly heterogeneous disease with different underlying biology across patients3 leading to different responses to foods. An emerging concept and potential solution is precision nutrition, in which the nutritional plan is tailored to the biological, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics of each patient to deliver an optimal, personalized diet based on measurement and/or prediction of individual responses to foods.4–6 Advancing the ability to measure the personal response to food, while still in its infancy, has been enabled by rapid technological innovations in multiomics platforms for data generation and analysis, including nutrigenomics, microbial metagenomics, metabolomics, and proteomics.4,7,8 In particular, recent discoveries have elucidated relationships between dietary intake, human gut microbiome composition, microbial metabolite production, mucosal homeostasis, and immune responses.9 This creates a tremendous opportunity for data-driven research toward understanding how to measure personal responses to food and how to implement personalized dietary management of IBD.5,6 Moreover, the emerging field of nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics—defined as the study of the effect of genetic variation on dietary response and the role of nutrients and bioactive food compounds in gene expression10,11—supports the concept that variations in the human genome can influence the impact of food on the microbiome, immune response, and mucosal homeostasis.12,13 It is important to note that in addition to genotype variation and gene expression studies, nutrient–gene interactions can be further understood by the integration of epigenomics analysis. Diet on its own or by interaction with other environmental factors can cause epigenetic changes, leading to alterations in gene expression patterns.14,15 It has been shown that dietary molecules can act as epigenetic modulators of (1) DNA methylation, (2) histone acetylation/deacetylation, and (3) small noncoding RNA expression. Thus, dietary molecules can induce epigenetic changes by direct interaction with the enzymes responsible for adding or removing epigenetic marks or, indirectly, on the regulation of the expression of genes that encode proteins involved in the function of the epigenetic machinery.14 It is worth noting that a patient’s response to diet is a bidirectional activity, so that researchers should evaluate the effects of food on a given biological variable (eg, microbiome) and also the effect of that variable on the metabolism of food.16 In addition to the measurement of personal responses to diet based on biological factors, an important environmental variable to take into consideration when measuring personal response to food is the variation in lifestyle, in particular in patterns of physical activity (PA). Variation in the levels of PA may affect individual metabolism and thus the response to diet.16 In addition, PA may also have an influence on genetic predisposition to metabolic disturbances. For instance, it has been reported that sedentary behavior correlates with increased body mass index (BMI) in carriers of BMI-predisposing polymorphisms whereas greater PA attenuated the genetic effects on BMI.17 The current availability of accelerometers integrated in wearable devices will make the analysis of PA a more objective measure (compared to self-report questionnaires) that can be incorporated into precision nutrition studies.18,19 Overall, precision nutrition research in IBD should thus focus on the identification of biological parameters that reflect and/or predict IBD patient’s physiological response to foods, based on the analysis and integration of 1 or more sources of patient data (such as nutrigenomics, epigenomics, microbiomics, metabolomics, and/or proteomics), together with tracking of food consumption, PA4,8 and relevant patient outcomes (eg, remission, relapse, exacerbation).2 These biomarker signatures should predict patient-level responses to specific foods, including triggering of disease (eg, symptom exacerbation) and may identify subgroups of patients likely to respond well to a specific therapeutic diet leading to symptom improvement and disease remission.4 Ideally, identified signatures should also provide a source of hypotheses to implement studies aimed to understand the exact mechanism of action (MoA) of foods with beneficial or deleterious effects in response to the unique biology of each patient, their diets, or individual food components. In addition to the implementation of multiomics platforms to facilitate the advancement of precision nutrition, there is also potential for biosensor and biosampling technologies. In particular, novel biosensor technologies integrated into swallowable capsules20 or wearable bracelets21 are in development for continuous monitoring of intestinal inflammatory markers, which could be adapted for the identification, in real time, of foods capable of inducing inflammation. In addition, gas sensor pills, which take longitudinal measurements of gas profiles in the gut can be correlated to intestinal transit times as indirect measurement, for instance, of the effect of high vs low fiber diet.22 Gas profiles, which are modified by diet,23 may also relate directly to specific metabolic and digestive processes and/or to specific pathophysiological differences in nutrient metabolism.24,25 Finally, “pill samplers”—swallowable capsules that collect luminal fluids and microbes along the gastrointestinal—may be useful to measure nutrients as well as metabolite and microbiome composition allowing a precise characterization of differential diet–microbiota–host interactions along different areas of the GI tract.23,26 Thus taken together, biosensor/biosampler generated information and multiomic derived biomarkers will represent an unprecedented approach in defining the mechanism by which nutrition plays a role in heath and disease, and should support evidence-based design of personalized anti-inflammatory diets for patients, in order to prevent disease relapses and exacerbation of symptoms or induce remission. Recognizing the importance and need to elucidate the impact of individual diets on health and disease, the National Institutes of Health launched the 2020–2030 Strategic Plan for NIH Nutrition Research to create a research framework to advance the field of precision nutrition.27 Research in the field of precision nutrition has evolved from the pioneering work of Segal and Elinav and colleagues.28,29 In one important study, glucose levels were continuously monitored, and meal compositions were recorded, revealing that the impact of a particular food on blood glucose was highly variable from individual to individual and suggesting that personalized, rather than universal dietary recommendations were needed for optimal glycemic control. A range of physiological and microbiome parameters were also assessed and evaluated using machine learning to develop a predictive model, incorporating blood markers, dietary habits, PA, and microbiome features, able to predict individual glycemic responses to specific foods and then make personalized dietary recommendations. Personalized diet plans were then compared to standard dietary recommendations and were shown to improve glycemic response to a dietary challenge.28 The model was further evaluated in a US validation cohort study.30 More recently, the PREDICT 1 study evaluated postprandial metabolic responses to food, including glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and additional metabolic parameters, in a large real-world cohort, including twin pairs. Comprehensive assessment of individual responses to meals was performed, taking into account meal composition, blood markers, microbiome markers, circadian PA, and meal timing to develop machine learning based predictive models for individual responses to foods. The models were also shown to be predictive of risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease as assessed using widely accepted risk assessment methods.19,31 Taken together, these results provide proof of concept that a precision nutrition approach is feasible and sets the stage for its application in different therapeutic areas, including IBD. The application of the precision nutrition paradigm in the IBD field is an emerging concept. Focused studies that evaluate individual responses to food based on the analysis of well-defined biological factors and their correlation with the improvement of clinical endpoints in IBD are still lacking. Addressing this important patient need, the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation (Foundation) has identified the goal of understanding how diet affects IBD, particularly at the individual patient level, as a critical gap in the understanding and management of these diseases, and as an opportunity to make a significant impact on the quality of life of patients. In order to address this knowledge gap and provide a solid and focused platform to advance this field, the Foundation has recently launched a precision nutrition research initiative. The overarching goal of this initiative is to develop methodologies that will enable measuring and incorporating individual biological, clinical, and lifestyle characteristics of a patient, together with the mechanistic understanding of specific food effects on disease outcomes, to design comprehensive, personalized nutrition plans for IBD patients. The expectation is that this knowledge would provide an evidence-based rationale for randomized control trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of rationally designed therapeutic diets in improving patient outcomes. The long-term goal would be to generate predictive models, including quantitative and qualitative measurement of responses to food, which could be integrated into the discussion between patients and practitioners about personalized IBD management. Importantly, there is strong evidence that dietary interventions can in fact be as effective as medical therapy for the management of inflammation in certain IBD populations. Notably, exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), a highly restrictive elimination diet, has been adopted as a first-line therapy to induce remission in pediatric Crohn disease (CD) in many countries; its efficacy (comparable to steroids) suggests that elimination of dietary triggers of inflammation can be highly beneficial, safe, and cost-effective.32–35 However, EEN is difficult to maintain over the long term and does not allow patients to enjoy the health and lifestyle benefits of a varied diet. Therefore, more personalized and less restrictive diets, in which a smaller number of dietary triggers specific to the individual patient’s physiology would be eliminated, would be highly attractive to patients. Research into dietary management of IBD has historically not received a level of investment comparable to research into pharmacological interventions1; however, it is important to recognize that the impact of diet is of great interest to IBD patients. IBD Partners is a patient-centric research program, funded by the Foundation and led by the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. Diet has been consistently ranked by patients and caregivers through the IBD Partners crowdsourcing and voting process as one of the most critical research priorities in the field. If precision nutrition is to become a reality, research must focus on identifying biological signatures and/or mechanisms of response to food in IBD patients and their correlation with disease outcomes. At a minimum, the following is needed: (1) Identification of associations between baseline features (eg, microbiome composition) and response to diet (eg, clinical remission or relapse); (2) Testing of these associations prospectively in a population to determine whether predicted responses are correct; and (3) Evaluation of whether personalized recommendations based on predictions result in better outcomes.16 Advancing precision nutrition also depends on clinical studies of ethnically diverse and appropriately sized cohorts of patients with well-defined phenotypes, accurate tracking of environmental exposures and harmonized processes to enable comparison of data across studies. Considerations for IBD cohort studies of environmental factors, including diet, have been reviewed in detail by the In addition, we have recently reviewed the and to in biomarker research the IBD initiative is an of an designed to create harmonized data in the IBD In order to advance the field of precision nutrition in IBD, the Foundation has designed a research that the of 4 research from different and a that nutrition research IBD and and The precision nutrition research is in a that the is more than the of its research a unique approach that will an important of information to the precision nutrition leading to a of how diet to the clinical and management of IBD. More will provide evidence to understand how patients respond to food and how to diet to the biological and clinical characteristics of patients based on the identification of biomarkers and predictive analytical to support the potential of diet as personalized therapy for IBD. shown in these are focused on 4 of the precision nutrition initiative for IBD. by a approach, this initiative needed to the IBD precision nutrition with the overarching goal of evidence to support the implementation of personalized diet recommendations for the management of IBD. These (1) of rationally designed anti-inflammatory diets to improve disease outcomes in randomized clinical (2) identification of biomarkers to predict subgroups of IBD patients are and to these anti-inflammatory diets, (3) identification of that can symptoms or induce disease relapse, and development of in predictive tools to design evidence-based therapeutic diets, efficacy can be evaluated in A critical at the of this initiative is the of artificial intelligence analysis of multiomics data for the identification of the biomarkers to make predictions of response to food, in order to enable precise and effective therapeutic diet recommendations. of the precision nutrition initiative for IBD. by a approach, this initiative needed to the IBD precision nutrition with the overarching goal of evidence to support the implementation of personalized diet recommendations for the management of IBD. These (1) of rationally designed anti-inflammatory diets to improve disease outcomes in randomized clinical (2) identification of biomarkers to predict subgroups of IBD patients are and to these anti-inflammatory diets, (3) identification of that can symptoms or induce disease relapse, and development of in predictive tools to design evidence-based therapeutic diets, efficacy can be evaluated in A critical at the of this initiative is the of artificial intelligence analysis of multiomics data for the identification of the biomarkers to make predictions of response to food, in order to enable precise and effective therapeutic diet recommendations. Evaluation of evidence-based and rationally designed anti-inflammatory diets in Identification of biomarkers to predict and/or and to these different Identification of dietary triggers of of in analytical tools to predict treatment response to food leading to design of personalized dietary recommendations. the challenge of precision nutrition in IBD in a unique as food diet for on of evidence (1) the beneficial effects of certain on of (2) the effects of dietary on beneficial intestinal microbial and on of microbes (eg, and (3) the effects of on the of anti-inflammatory and from the University of have designed an anti-inflammatory food diet based on the of foods the addition of anti-inflammatory and The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of this food diet on of remission in in a The will be clinical response at outcomes will clinical remission, in and and changes in of PA, and quality of and will be to the inflammatory This study will identify clinical, PA, and multiomic signatures based on microbiomics, metabolomics, and to and which is the of precision Diet to optimize and nutrient composition in In order to design diets that can support long-term health in IBD patients, it is important to that many patients are due to individual differences in diet (eg, of many foods as potential and/or differences in of specific This the need for more precise dietary recommendations taking into account not of specific dietary also the overall nutritional of the and at the University of are a clinical trial to whether a foods anti-inflammatory diet, designed using a approach as by and also optimized to of The goal of the is to induce remission in patients with The diet is designed and to of specific nutrients shown to be in many patients with and dietary is personalized to the patient’s nutritional at The outcomes are clinical remission and In addition, physiological will be assessed using and including which will be particularly important to metabolism of research endpoints metabolomics, microbiome composition, and function of immune The goal of the is to identify biomarkers to predict therapeutic response to diet in Importantly, this study the of wearable and accelerometers to and PA and sedentary time into predictive Identification of dietary triggers of In order to advance the precision nutrition field, the identification of dietary that can trigger symptoms exacerbation and relapse, as well as of the underlying biological factors, are and at the University of the University of the University of the for in and the for will identify dietary triggers of relapse the that in the EEN clinical remission in of with and that in most patients this therapeutic effect is of a diet the of or enteral These that dietary the benefits of EEN and an clinical model to identify foods capable of triggering disease This research approach from the critical of of gut inflammation following of EEN and to diet to identify dietary triggers of inflammation. EEN microbiome and profiles suggesting that the therapeutic effects of EEN are due in part to these Thus, the effects of identified dietary triggers of inflammation on intestinal microbiome, and profiles will be evaluated in addition to clinical parameters of disease this study will advance the understanding of the mechanisms by which food disease activity and gut and will identify the biological underlying response to different diets of patients in their In addition to dietary triggers identification, a goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the diet a is a diet, designed to the nutritional composition of foods, with the of certain dietary compounds (eg, and to nutrient of The is to to prevent or the of intestinal inflammation food as a potential dietary for of remission. In personalized predictions of response to While new diet studies in IBD are it is also important to and data across studies and cohorts to relationships between specific food metabolism and outcomes in specific patient populations. integration the development and implementation of novel analytical including and artificial and and at the University of are taking of technological advances in order to this large data sets the of many real-world from have foods, and of dietary molecules by the the are tracking and to the composition of an diet based on and microbiome learning will then be to identify associations between food microbiome composition, and clinical outcomes in IBD data sets and to rationally design diets based on these This approach is enabled by recent advances and data availability and the potential for artificial intelligence to real-world data and clinical trial outcomes to advance precision nutrition for IBD. Importantly, one of the most of this approach is the need to and clinical data into a for integrated analysis. of data and in IBD studies could such across as we have a question by IBD should I to based largely on a process at lack evidence and predictive tools to deliver the right diet to the right patient at the right time in order to symptoms, induce remission, and prevent disease address this need, the emerging concept of precision nutrition a framework in which the integration of clinical, lifestyle, and biological parameters is to predict individual patient responses to food, the design of personalized and dietary plans to advance the field of precision nutrition in IBD, the Foundation launched a pioneering that (1) the of anti-inflammatory diets to improve disease outcomes in (2) the development of predictive models and biomarkers to identify subgroups of IBD patients are and to these diets, (3) the identification of that can symptoms or induce disease relapse in certain patients, and development of artificial intelligence based in predictive tools to rationally design therapeutic diets efficacy can be evaluated in We are that the time is with the technological and analytical tools to create the evidence base and predictive tools necessary to the and the of to support the concept that diets tailored to the clinical, lifestyle, and biological characteristics of IBD patients, may represent a novel and effective approach to improve disease outcomes. The would to the of the precision nutrition and for their We are also of the from additional and The would also to the for this and for the to this as well as for in the Finally, the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation the support for the precision nutrition initiative by of the Crohn’s & Colitis Research and by is not to this as new data were or in this The precision nutrition initiative is by from of the Crohn’s & Colitis Research and of The or of interest to this
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hurtado‐Lorenzo et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: