This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Aims: The study aim was to determine whether brief online suicide awareness training could increase rail workers': (1) knowledge about how to intervene safely with someone at risk on the rail; (2) belief that the rail industry could help to reduce suicides on the rail; (3) confidence to intervene with someone at risk on the rail; and (4) likelihood that they would intervene with someone at risk on the rail. Method: 1,050 rail workers completed the training and pre-/postsurveys designed to assess the impact of the training. We calculated the proportional mean change between the pre- and postintervention periods for each outcome. Results: Significant increases were observed across all outcomes. For rail workers' knowledge of how to intervene safely the proportional mean difference was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.14 to 1.16), for belief that rail workers can help to reduce rail suicides it was 1.14 (95% CI: 1.13 to 1.16), for confidence to intervene with someone at risk on the rail it was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.22 to 1.27), and for likelihood of intervention with someone at risk on the rail it was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.05). Limitations: This study relied on a pre-/postdesign without a control group, limiting causal inferences. Conclusion: Brief online suicide prevention awareness training appears to be effective in improving outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clapperton et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: