High dose dipyridamole myocardial imaging: simultaneous sestamibi scintigraphy and two-dimensional echocardiography in the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Dipyridamole stress combined with echocardiography or perfusion scintigraphy can be used to detect coronary artery disease, but head-to-head comparative data are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the relative accuracy of high-dose dipyridamole stress imaging (up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10 min) with two-dimensional echocardiography and sestamibi perfusion scintigraphy in detecting coronary artery disease. METHODS: One-hundred and one patients with a history of chest pain and no previous myocardial infarction, were studied simultaneously using planar perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography during a high-dose dipyridamole stress, at seven different institutions. RESULTS: During coronary angiography, 21 patients had non-significant lesions, and 80 had significant lesions (> or = 50% diameter reduction): 37 had single-, 19 double- and 24 triple-vessel disease. Sensitivity for disease detection was 78% [95% confidence interval (CI) 67-86%] for echocardiography and 79% (CI 68-87%) for scintigraphy. The specificity was 76% (CI 67-84%) for echocardiography and 90% (CI 83-95%) for scintigraphy. The inter-center variation in accuracy ranged from 50 to 100% for echocardiography (coefficient of variation 19.7%) and from 71 to 100% for scintigraphy (coefficient of variation 15%). The angiographically assessed extent and severity of coronary artery disease, evaluated using the Duke score, was correlated to the extent and severity of perfusion defects with scintigraphy (r = 0.65, P < 0.0001) and regional wall motion abnormalities by echocardiography (r = 0.57, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography have similar accuracies for the non-invasive identification of angiographically assessed coronary artery disease during high-dose dipyridamole stress. Inter-center variability in diagnostic accuracy is higher for echocardiography than scintigraphy. Both methods allow a reasonably accurate estimation of extent and severity of disease, via a semiquantitative assessment of extent and severity of perfusion of functional defects.