The influence of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) sorption on the phase behavior of two polystyrene- block -poly( n -alkyl methacrylate) copolymers was studied. One, polystyrene- block -poly( n -hexyl methacrylate), P(S- b -nHMA), exhibits an order−disorder transition (ODT), whereas the other, polystyrene- block -poly( n -butyl methacrylate), P(S- b -nBMA), exhibits a lower disorder−order transition (LDOT). CO 2 sorption increases miscibility of the segments in P(S- b -nHMA) slightly: the ODT is depressed by less than 7 °C at a CO 2 fluid density of 0.25 g/cm 3, which corresponds to 7 vol % dilation of the copolymer with CO 2 at the conditions studied. In contrast, CO 2 sorption decreased the miscibility of P(S- b -nBMA) markedly: the LDOT was depressed by more than 70 °C at densities < 0.06 g/cm 3, which corresponds to less than 3 vol % sorption of CO 2 . Unlike P(S- b -nHMA), ordering transitions in CO 2 -dilated P(S- b -nBMA) exhibit a pronounced thermal hysteresis that increases with increasing volume fraction of sorbed diluent. The hysteresis is a consequence of the sensitivity of the LDOT system to differences in CO 2 sorption between the ordered and disordered states, as evidenced by neutron reflectivity measurements. The difference in the effect of CO 2 sorption on the phase behavior of the copolymers is attributed to the different nature of the transitions. The entropically driven LDOT is depressed by differential dilation of the copolymer domains, which increases both the compressibility of the system and disparities in compressibility between the blocks. In contrast, the enthalpically driven ODT is depressed by the screening of segmental interactions by CO 2 and is less sensitive to compressibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogt et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Macromolecules